Comments on: We Think, Therefore We Are Giveaway! http://scifichick.com/2008/12/22/we-think-therefore-we-are-giveaway/ News and Reviews Fri, 10 Feb 2012 20:28:28 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: SciFiChick http://scifichick.com/2008/12/22/we-think-therefore-we-are-giveaway/comment-page-1/#comment-39980 SciFiChick Sat, 10 Jan 2009 02:25:20 +0000 http://scifichick.com/?p=1724#comment-39980 flaredOne - You are correct. People who leave comments here are not entered. The form above must be filled out with a valid mailing address. And of course, no one would want their addresses out there for everyone to see. flaredOne – You are correct. People who leave comments here are not entered. The form above must be filled out with a valid mailing address. And of course, no one would want their addresses out there for everyone to see.

]]> By: Eanel1 http://scifichick.com/2008/12/22/we-think-therefore-we-are-giveaway/comment-page-1/#comment-39976 Eanel1 Sat, 10 Jan 2009 00:50:34 +0000 http://scifichick.com/?p=1724#comment-39976 SciFi is a passion of mine. SciFi is a passion of mine.

]]> By: flared0ne http://scifichick.com/2008/12/22/we-think-therefore-we-are-giveaway/comment-page-1/#comment-39973 flared0ne Fri, 09 Jan 2009 22:57:37 +0000 http://scifichick.com/?p=1724#comment-39973 I have to wonder if there aren't TWO completely separate comment entry forms here, and only ONE of them is valid for entering your giveaway!! If I read it correctly, the visible comments posted here are NOT correctly entered, while the comment entry form at the top IS the correct place, but THOSE entries aren't visible. Which would explain the "visible" lack of numbers contending for a first-rate prize!! I have to wonder if there aren’t TWO completely separate comment entry forms here, and only ONE of them is valid for entering your giveaway!!

If I read it correctly, the visible comments posted here are NOT correctly entered, while the comment entry form at the top IS the correct place, but THOSE entries aren’t visible.

Which would explain the “visible” lack of numbers contending for a first-rate prize!!

]]> By: Timothy Sternberg http://scifichick.com/2008/12/22/we-think-therefore-we-are-giveaway/comment-page-1/#comment-39967 Timothy Sternberg Fri, 09 Jan 2009 16:02:20 +0000 http://scifichick.com/?p=1724#comment-39967 Looks interesting! Looks interesting!

]]> By: Roseann K. http://scifichick.com/2008/12/22/we-think-therefore-we-are-giveaway/comment-page-1/#comment-39961 Roseann K. Fri, 09 Jan 2009 12:32:36 +0000 http://scifichick.com/?p=1724#comment-39961 Great giveaway! Thanks! Great giveaway! Thanks!

]]> By: Angie Prater http://scifichick.com/2008/12/22/we-think-therefore-we-are-giveaway/comment-page-1/#comment-39948 Angie Prater Thu, 08 Jan 2009 06:35:44 +0000 http://scifichick.com/?p=1724#comment-39948 I would love to win this!! Thanks! I would love to win this!! Thanks!

]]>